The Life of Middle
Earth
By Marcus De Iulio
By Marcus De Iulio
Differences and Similarities:
Through out my life of watching the Lord of the
Rings as well as reading the books, I have noticed and wondered about the
differences and similarities of the movies from the book. After a week of
reading the books and watching the movies straight after again, and asking the
director of the wonderful movies, Peter Jackson, about it, I finally found the
most important differences and similarities from the books too the movies.
· In the prologue, Elrond is shown leading Isildur into the fiery
mountain, Mount Doom,
and bidding him throw the Ring into the Cracks
of Doom. In the book, Elrond and the Elf-lord Círdan standing
with Isildur beside their dead counseled him to take the Ring into the mountain
and throw it into the Cracks of Doom near at hand, but Isildur refused and took
the Ring instead as wergild for the death of his father.
· In the movie, the mischief of Merry and Pippin in
launching Gandalf's best rocket was a fabrication of the screenplay. This did
not occur in the book.
· In the book it was Glorfindel not Arwen who came to rescue Strider and the hobbits from
the Nazgul.
·
The
uruk Lurtz who mortally wounds Boromir and is killed by Aragorn
does not exist in the book.
·
When
the Fellowship was at the Gates of Moria, Merry and Pippin threw rocks in to
the water and Aragorn stopped them. In the books, Boromir threw rocks and Frodo
stopped him.
The Two Towers:
·
When questioned by Faramir in the book, Frodo
said, "I told you no lies, and of the truth all I could." In the
movie, Frodo lied to Faramir when he was asked about "the gangrel
creature" that had been seen with them.
· In the movie, Frodo,
Sam, and Gollum were brought to Osgiliath on the western shore of Anduin, which they could only reach by openly crossing the
river exposing them all, and especially the Ring, to capture. In the book, the
hobbits and Gollum were sent on their way from Henneth Annun and were not taken to Osgiliath.
After the events at Osgiliath in the screenplay, the three were shown the
tunnel, which did not exist in the book, and allowed to take their journey. (In
the book, a bridge joined the two parts of the city and there was no mention of
a tunnel).
· The outcome of the Entmoot in the book was that the Ents chose to go to war,
but in the movie, they chose not to. They were later manipulated by Pippin into doing so anyway.
· The screenplay has Théoden sending his people to Helm's Deep for refuge
even though that is exactly where he expects the battle to be fought. In the
book, he sends them to the equal safety of Dunharrow.
The Return of the King:
·
One of the most unaccountable changes in the
story made by the screenplay is Frodo casting Sam away after Sam offers to
carry the One Ring once they had reached the top of the Stairs of Cirith Ungol.
This did not happen in the book. Frodo and Sam remained together and did not
part until Frodo was taken into the Tower of Cirith Ungol.
·
In the movie, the conversation between Eowyn and the Witch King on the Fields of Pelennor is
significantly changed from the book's version. The version in the book is one
of the best examples of Tolkien's dialogue and many fans were disappointed to
see it cut so dramatically.
·
In the movie, Merry fights at the battle at the
Black Gates, whereas in the book, he is at the Houses of Healing, recovering from the
Battle of the Pelennor Fields.
· In the book, Prince
Imrahil of Dol Amroth comes to aid Minas Tirith during its siege. In the movie,
there was no Dol Amroth force.
And to my conclusion is that there are many differences and similarities
between the movie and books, for better or worse.



What did you like better? Why do you think there are differences? I think sometimes this is about pace. They have to grab the audiences attention a bit more in films.
ReplyDelete